Veto intransigence

Thus, the country has led from the front in calling for the abolition of this discriminatory prerogative exercised by the permanent members of the UN Security Council.

It reiterated this demand yesterday during a General Assembly debate while warning that the misuse of the veto power undermines the Council's effectiveness and weakens the credibility of the UN, while also perpetuating sheer injustice within the international system.Islamabad apparently views the lopsided and unregulated system currently in vogue as the root cause behind wars and rising economic disparity.

The prime reason behind these fissures is the desire on the part of great powers to instil their own jaundiced political order in contravention of the norms of decency and civilisation.

Pakistan, thus, called for either the abolition of the veto or, at a minimum, severely restricting its usage.

It was, however, categorical in opposing any expansion of permanent members at the world body in general.This perspective is seen by many as utopian in essence.

The international order that rose from the ashes of WWII encourages powerful actors to look after their own interests at the expense of peace and justice.

Likewise, it has widely obstructed collective action on international peace and security issues, leaving the UN appearing toothless as the exercise of veto power leads to unchecked wars and aggression.

Last but not least, binding resolutions pertaining to the attainment of statehood and self-determination remain unimplemented.Islamabad's prescription has substance, and the developing world must come forward to support it.

UNGA Resolution 76/262, which provides for a General Assembly debate following the exercise of a veto to promote greater accountability, must be fully utilised to deter the unilateral and arbitrary exercise of this intransigent attitude.

Only then can the UN become a truly responsible entity, protecting the interests of smaller states while ushering in peace and prosperity.