SHC rejects state appeal against Mahrang’s acquittal

The complainant stated that Mahrang was a facilitator of terrorist organisations that were enticing educated youth from Balochistan and arranging a movement of terrorists under the guise of processions and rallies.

A year later, an anti-terrorism court (ATC) acquitted Mahrang, ruling that the prosecution had failed to present credible evidence.

Subsequently, the acting prosecutor general Sindh challenged the acquittal before the SHC in December 2025.During today's hearing, the high court questioned the prosecution's authority to challenge the acquittal, observing that the original complainant in the case was a private individual.

The bench questioned how the prosecution could independently file an appeal against the acquittal when the case had been lodged by a private complainant.The prosecution argued that the ATC had overlooked material facts while allowing Mahrang's application for acquittal.

The state counsel maintained that clear evidence existed against her and argued that the prosecution should have been allowed to present its evidence during the trial.The prosecutor further contended that acquitting her before the formal framing of charges was inappropriate, as the prosecution had not yet presented its case before the trial court.

However, the high court declared the appeal not maintainable and dismissed it, leaving the ATC's acquittal decision undisturbed.

SHC rejects state appeal against Mahrang's acquittal Nasir Butt | Updated 14 minutes ago | .