Skip to content
Pakistan Edition Saturday, October 24, 2026 Live newsroom RSS
Advertisement
22MEDIA INTERNATIONAL ENGLISH

Taking away taxman’s bias

Under new model, cases will be selected through computerised, risk-based algorithm rather than by individual officersThe establishment of the National Faceless Centre (NFC) in Islamabad by the Federal Board of Revenue marks a significant shift in Pakistan's tax administration.

Taking away taxman’s bias
22MEDIA INTERNATIONALWorld Desk
World22MEDIA STORY
Share
IN SHORT

Under new model, cases will be selected through computerised, risk-based algorithm rather than by individual officersThe establishment of the National Faceless Centre (NFC) in Islamabad by the Federal Board of Revenue marks a significant shift in Pakistan's tax administration.

World
22MEDIA REPORTWorld
2 min read

By eliminating direct contact between taxpayers and tax officials, the initiative aims to curb corruption, reduce discretionary powers and enhance transparency in audit and assessment processes.

The reform is also not as radical as opponents would claim – similar models have been employed for many years in countries such as the UK, Australia, and even India.Under the new model, cases will be selected through a computerised, risk-based algorithm rather than by individual officers, and each case will pass through three separate hands – audit, assessment, and quality control.

The initial focus will be on third-party data that shows visible wealth discrepancies, including air travel, luxury vehicles and lavish properties.

This would help ensure that anyone facing a full audit already has some explaining to do, rather than being randomly called in.

Also, given that almost all of Pakistan's ultra-rich underreport their incomes, third-party data alone will provide enough data to keep the FBR busy for several months.However, legitimate concerns remain.

The Finance Bill 2026 provides that NFC orders cannot be challenged on jurisdictional grounds alone.

In effect, this means that the faceless adjudicators may well be shielded from procedural accountability.

Smaller taxpayers with limited legal capacity may also face pressure to accept algorithmic settlement offers without meaningful paths to appeal.

In a positive development, the National Assembly Standing Committee has flagged the need for safeguards against algorithmic manipulation, data tampering and privacy breaches.

Under new model, cases will be selected through computerised, risk-based algorithm rather than by individual officers.

\n

22Media International — Pakistan, world and bilingual digital newsroom coverage.

PUBLISHER22Media International
EDITORIAL STANDARDAccuracy · Corrections · Accountability
COVERAGE DESKWorld