PESCO loses court challenge in electric shock case

If the required prosthetic facilities are unavailable in Pakistan, the company must also bear the cost of treatment abroad.In its ruling, the court observed that electricity distribution companies were responsible not only for ensuring an uninterrupted power supply but also for protecting human lives and meeting safety requirements.PESCO had argued that its inquiry found no negligence on its part, claiming the incident resulted from an illegal direct connection rather than….

However, the company acknowledged that numerous illegal connections existed in the affected area.Lubaba suffered severe burns in July 2021 when an electricity line fell in Pir Qila, Charsadda, resulting in the amputation of both her hands and permanent disability.The Federal Ombudsman directed PESCO on October 24, 2024, to pay compensation in accordance with the applicable rules and regulations.

The complaint was initially upheld, but the findings requiring payment of compensation were subsequently withdrawn during review proceedings.On October 30, 2025, the President's Office directed PESCO to arrange her treatment and prosthetic limbs.

The company challenged the order, but the high court dismissed its petition, upholding the direction to provide the required assistance.

PESCO loses court challenge in electric shock case Our Correspondent | Updated 10 minutes ago | IHC rules utility must pay for nine-year-old Lubaba's artificial hands and rehabilitation.