Close Menu

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    Google Meet can now take notes at in-person meetings

    August 16, 2026

    WhatsApp tests AI tool that flags scam chats on-device

    August 16, 2026

    Belgium’s largest wildfire on record spreads towards German border | Climate News

    August 16, 2026
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    • Home
    • Politics
    • News
    • Magazines
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Login
    22Media22Media
    Subscribe
    • Home
    • News
      • Pakistan News
      • World News
      • Amazing News
      • Only On 22
    • Sports
    • Bussiness
    • Innovation
      • Health & Sciences
      • Technology
    • Culture
      • Crime & Justice
      • Entertainment
    • Politics
    • Magazines
    • Weather
    • Video
    • Live
    22Media22Media
    Home»Culture»Crime & Justice»UK court dismisses appeal of YouTuber Adil Raja, imposes fine
    Crime & Justice

    UK court dismisses appeal of YouTuber Adil Raja, imposes fine

    22febdm@gmail.comBy 22febdm@gmail.comMarch 4, 2026No Comments1 Min Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    The court imposed a substantial financial penalty of £350,000 (approximately Rs120 million).

    LONDON: The High Court of Justice has dismissed an appeal filed by YouTuber Adil Raja, dealing a significant legal setback to the self-styled investigative commentator.

    According to court proceedings, the Court of Appeal rejected Raja’s petition, upholding earlier findings against him.

    The court reportedly described his allegations as malicious and without foundation, ruling that claims of victimhood and political persecution did not withstand judicial scrutiny.

    During the hearing, the judge is said to have sought substantive evidence to support Raja’s claims. However, the court found his submissions insufficient and unsubstantiated.

    The High Court’s earlier judgment reportedly characterized his claims as baseless, reinforcing the finding that his statements lacked verifiable evidence.

    In addition to dismissing the appeal, the court imposed a substantial financial penalty of £350,000 (approximately Rs120 million).

    The verdict has sparked debate online, with supporters and critics reacting strongly to the outcome.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    22febdm@gmail.com
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Google Meet can now take notes at in-person meetings

    August 16, 2026

    Islam Makhachev breaks UFC record, holds off Garry to retain welterweight title

    August 16, 2026

    BLA flag draws attention to anti-Islamic agenda

    August 15, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Demo
    Our Picks
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Vimeo
    Don't Miss
    Crime & Justice

    Google Meet can now take notes at in-person meetings

    By 22febdm@gmail.comAugust 16, 20260

    Google Meet’s AI note-taking tool is no longer limited to online meetings. The “Take notes…

    WhatsApp tests AI tool that flags scam chats on-device

    August 16, 2026

    Belgium’s largest wildfire on record spreads towards German border | Climate News

    August 16, 2026

    Bangladesh says PM will not visit India until Hasina extradited

    August 16, 2026

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from SmartMag about art & design.

    22Media
    Facebook Instagram YouTube WhatsApp
    • Home
    • Politics
    • News
    • Magazines
    © 2026 22Media. Designed by AleemSoft Hub.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    Sign In or Register

    Welcome Back!

    Login to your account below.

    Lost password?