Time to retire quotas

For four decades, the 60:40 rural-urban split in government jobs and educational institutions has been a cornerstone of affirmative action, designed to bridge the divide between Sindh's developed and underdeveloped regions.

However, the policy now faces a fresh challenge from an unlikely coalition, as a growing number of educated Sindhi professionals are joining the chorus of Urdu-speaking critics to scrap the quota regime.Though outstanding rural performers pop up from time to time, the raw number of top performers this year is being used to argue for ending quotas.

Students from some of Sindh's most underdeveloped districts, including Tharparkar, outperformed candidates from Karachi, Hyderabad and Sukkur.

This empirical evidence directly challenges the quota system's foundational premise – that rural deprivation requires special protections.

At the same time, some experts have noted that rural students' improved performance has occurred despite the rural-urban resource gap not narrowing significantly – students are doing better despite the quota, not because of it.A more legitimate critique, however, is that despite increasing urbanisation, only Karachi, Hyderabad and Sukkur are considered "urban".

Larkana, which has the same population as Sukkur, is treated as rural, as are cities such as Mirpur Khas, Jacobabad and Tharparkar, which all have populations of over 200,000.

Urdu-speaking critics of quotas have long accused PPP of using them for political gain.

Time to retire quotas Editorial | Updated 29 minutes ago | .

22Media International — Pakistan, world and bilingual digital newsroom coverage.